An autonomous AI agent platform: you give an agent a goal in plain English and it plans, uses real tools, and delivers the finished work.

Is there a free plan?

Yes. Actus has a free plan to get started, with paid plans that add higher limits and advanced features like scheduled automations and team workspaces.

Can agents run automatically on a schedule?

Yes — agents can run hourly, daily, or on a custom cadence, so routine work happens automatically without you starting it each time.

How is Actus different from a chatbot?

A chatbot replies with text. An Actus agent takes action: it uses real tools to research, write, build, and send, then returns a finished deliverable instead of just advice.

Do I need to know how to code?

No. You describe your goal in plain English and the agent plans and executes the steps. Agents can write and run code when a task needs it, but you never have to.

Do I stay in control of what an agent does?

Yes. Irreversible actions require your approval, every run has budget and step limits, and each step is logged so you can see exactly what happened.

← Back to Blog

AI Research Assistant for Lead Qualification

Actus · September 30, 2026

AI researchlead qualificationsales automationlead generationB2B sales

AI Research Assistant for Lead Qualification

Lead qualification requires research: visiting websites, checking LinkedIn, reviewing recent news, and identifying pain points. A human can research 10 leads per hour. An AI research assistant can research 100 leads per hour and deliver structured summaries ready for outreach. The difference is not intelligence—it is speed and consistency.

What a Research Assistant Does

An AI research assistant for lead qualification performs five tasks:

Company overview: Extracts services, products, target market, and team size from the website.
Decision-maker identification: Finds the relevant contact (owner, CEO, marketing director) via LinkedIn or the company site.
Recent activity: Checks for news, blog posts, social media updates, hiring activity, or funding announcements.
Pain point detection: Identifies visible gaps (no website, outdated site, missing service pages, weak online presence).
Qualification scoring: Rates the lead based on ICP fit (industry, size, location, timing signals).

The output is a structured brief: company name, decision-maker, contact info, recent context, pain points, and a fit score. This brief feeds directly into outreach.

Why Manual Research Does Not Scale

Manual lead research is thorough but slow. A sales rep spends 5–10 minutes per lead:

Open the company website.
Read the about page and services.
Search LinkedIn for the decision-maker.
Check recent posts or news.
Decide if the lead is worth contacting.
Write notes in the CRM.

For 50 leads, that is 4–8 hours of research. An AI research assistant completes the same work in 30 minutes.

The Research Workflow

Step 1: Input the Lead List

The assistant takes a list of companies (names, websites, or LinkedIn URLs). This list may come from scraping, a purchased database, referrals, or manual prospecting.

Step 2: Visit and Extract

For each company, the assistant:

Visits the website and extracts key sections (homepage, about, services, contact).
Identifies the industry, service offerings, and geographic focus.
Checks for signals of size (team page, office locations, customer logos).

Step 3: Find the Decision-Maker

The assistant searches LinkedIn or the website for the relevant role:

Owner or CEO for small businesses.
Marketing director or VP of sales for mid-sized companies.
Department head for enterprise.

It records the name, title, and LinkedIn URL.

Step 4: Check Recent Activity

The assistant looks for:

Recent blog posts or news mentions.
LinkedIn posts from the company or decision-maker.
Job postings (a signal of growth).
Product launches or rebrands.

This context becomes the personalization hook for outreach.

Step 5: Identify Pain Points

The assistant flags common issues:

No website or a placeholder site.
Outdated design or content (copyright dates, broken links).
Missing key pages (services, contact, pricing, testimonials).
Weak online presence (no social media, few reviews).
Poor mobile experience or slow load times.

These observations guide the outreach angle.

Step 6: Score and Prioritize

The assistant scores each lead based on:

Fit: Does the company match your ICP (industry, size, location)?
Timing: Are there signals they might be ready to buy (hiring, funding, recent problems)?
Reachability: Is the decision-maker identifiable and contactable?

Leads are tagged as high, medium, or low priority.

Step 7: Deliver Structured Briefs

The output is a CRM-ready record or spreadsheet:

Company name
Website
Decision-maker name and title
LinkedIn URL
Recent activity summary
Pain points identified
Fit score
Recommended outreach angle

The sales team reviews the high-priority leads and personalizes outreach.

When to Use Automated Research

Automated research is most valuable when:

You have a high volume of leads (50+ per week).
Leads require similar research steps (company site, LinkedIn, recent activity).
Your ICP is clear and can be scored systematically.
Your team spends more time researching than actually reaching out.

Manual research still makes sense for:

Enterprise deals where each lead justifies 30+ minutes of deep research.
Complex buying committees requiring multi-stakeholder mapping.
Highly nuanced fit criteria that are hard to define algorithmically.

Common Mistakes

Relying on Stale Data

Some databases provide company information that is months or years old. An AI research assistant should pull fresh data from live websites and LinkedIn, not cached records.

Not Verifying Contact Information

Finding a decision-maker's name is one step. Verifying their email address is another. If the assistant cannot verify the email, flag it for manual verification rather than sending blindly.

Over-Automating the Qualification Decision

The assistant should score and recommend, not auto-disqualify. A lead that scores low on paper might still be a good fit if there is context the algorithm missed. Humans should review the scores and make final calls.

Forgetting to Update the CRM

Research is only useful if it ends up in your CRM. The assistant should automatically log every brief, attach it to the lead record, and tag the lead with its priority score.

Research Assistant vs. Manual Prospecting

Here is how the workflows compare:

Manual prospecting:

Sales rep searches LinkedIn for 2 hours.
Rep opens 30 profiles, reviews each, decides 10 are worth contacting.
Rep researches those 10 companies individually (websites, recent news).
Rep drafts personalized messages.
Total time: 4–5 hours for 10 sends.

AI research assistant:

Assistant scrapes LinkedIn and returns 100 profiles matching ICP criteria.
Assistant researches all 100 companies (websites, LinkedIn, news) in 30 minutes.
Assistant scores and prioritizes; flags top 20 as high-priority.
Sales rep reviews the 20 briefs, picks 10 to contact, and personalizes messages.
Total time: 1 hour for 10 sends.

The assistant does not replace judgment. It compresses the research phase so the human can focus on decision-making and relationship-building.

What to Look for in a Research Assistant Tool

Multi-Source Data

The tool should pull from:

Company websites
LinkedIn (company and personal profiles)
News and press releases
Social media
Public databases (for firmographics)

A tool that only checks one source will miss context.

Structured Output

The research brief should be formatted consistently:

Company name, website, decision-maker name and title.
Contact information (email, LinkedIn URL, phone if available).
Recent activity summary (1–2 sentences).
Pain points or gaps identified.
Fit score and priority tag.

Unstructured notes are hard to act on at scale.

CRM Integration

The assistant should push briefs directly into your CRM as lead records with all fields populated. No manual copy-paste.

Configurable Scoring

You should be able to define what "qualified" means:

ICP criteria (industry, company size, location)
Positive signals (recent hiring, product launch, weak online presence)
Negative signals (wrong industry, out of service area, already using competitor)

Out-of-the-box scoring is too generic for most businesses.

Example Workflow for a Marketing Agency

A marketing agency targeting local businesses in Florida uses this workflow:

Discover: Scrape Google Maps for service businesses (contractors, salons, fitness studios) in Fort Myers and Naples.
Research: The assistant visits each business website, checks for online presence gaps (no reviews, outdated site, missing service pages), and identifies the owner via LinkedIn.
Score: High priority = active business, 2–10 employees, weak website, no clear online booking. Medium = established site but missing key pages. Low = outside service area or already has strong digital presence.
Brief: The assistant delivers 50 briefs ranked by priority.
Outreach: The agency reviews the top 20, drafts personalized messages, and sends.

This workflow runs weekly, generating 20 qualified outreach opportunities per week with 1 hour of human oversight.

Why Actus Agent

Actus Agent researches leads at scale: visiting websites, checking LinkedIn, identifying decision-makers, detecting pain points, and scoring fit. It delivers structured briefs ready for outreach and logs everything in your CRM.

For teams spending hours each week on manual research, this is the difference between 10 qualified leads and 100.

Learn more at actusagent.cc